








|
|
|
Organizational Systems
Five Strategies - The Core of How to Succeed
Appreciative Inquiry - Cascadia's Way
The institution's mission and goals give direction to all its educational activities, to its
admission policies, selection of faculty, allocation of resources, and to planning.
Description
Cascadia's vision of itself is as a "community of learners" with a mission to provide
a caring culture to support "creative, comprehensive, culturally rich, technologically
advanced and learner-centered education that is environmentally sensitive and
seamlessly linked with the community area enterprise and other educational institutions."
All educational activities, policies, recruitment of staff and faculty, planning,
budgeting, and assessment processes are grounded in that vision and mission.
Assessment
As one board member wrote on the Board of Trustees' Survey (1.1), "The mission
statement is used as the basic context against which all actions and directions are
measured." As such, everything ultimately derives from the college's vision, mission,
and values.
A Learning Organization
The introduction to Cascadia's institutional core values identifies the college as a
"learning organization:"
As a learning organization, Cascadia continually strives to reach the highest
levels of quality in its academic, student and administrative programs and
services through continual analysis, assessment and improvement.
The concept of the "learning organization" was introduced into the organizational
development literature by Peter Senge (1.24). In the opening paragraphs of
the book, Senge describes learning organizations as "organizations where people
continually expand their capacity to create the results they truly desire, where new
and expansive patterns of thinking are nurtured, where collective aspiration is set
free, and where people are continually learning how to learn together" (p.1). Senge
identifies five "core disciplines" of learning organizations: personal mastery (without
personal learning, no organizational learning occurs), mental models (the practice of "surfacing, testing, and improving our internal pictures of how the world works," p.174), shared vision (building a common sense of purpose by developing shared images of the future we seek), team learning ("the process of aligning and developing the capacity of a team to create the results its members truly desire," p.236), and systems thinking (understanding and utilizing the forces and interrelationships that shape the behavior of systems). The concept and disciplines of a "learning organization" are at the core of
Cascadia's identity, and are reflected throughout the college's organizational structures,
processes, and programs as discussed throughout this Self Study document.
Particularly noteworthy are the many opportunities for professional growth and
development provided to Cascadia employees-discussed here because they reflect
the college's vision, mission, and strategic directions. As a learning organization, Cascadia is strongly committed to the professional development of its employees. A Professional Development Committee helps shape and direct several distinct professional development opportunities, including the Professional Development Request For Proposal (RFP) Process, the Presenter's Fund, the Innovations Project, the Employee Learning Institute (ELI), and the Teaching and Learning Academy (TLA). A brief description of each follows.
- Professional Development Committee: Chaired by the Vice President for Finance
and Information Technology, this group serves a coordinating function to
help ensure that the various professional development initiatives are at the
same time comprehensive and complementary of one another.
- Professional Development RFP Process: Employees may apply, individually or in
groups, for funding to support attendance at conferences, workshops, institutes
or other training events. In their applications, employees must connect
the requested training to aspects of their jobs and describe how they and the
college will benefit from their attendance. As part of the award, employees are
required to "give back" to the college in some way, typically by sharing some
aspect of what they learned at a forum or seminar for other Cascadia employees.
- Presenters' Fund: This fund is designed to support Cascadia employees who
have had proposals accepted at national conferences. It was established in
2001-2002 specifically to support those individuals who submitted proposals
for the League for Innovation's Innovations 2002 conference (Boston, March
2002) in direct response to encouragement from college executive staff to do
so.
- The Innovations Project: This project invites proposals from Cascadia employees,
including those who are part-time and/or temporary, as well as students
with an employee sponsor. Proposals are considered that will bring innovative
ideas to "life" at Cascadia, whether these ideas be novel/creative approaches,
practices, perspectives, or solutions.
- The Employee Learning Institute (ELI): An outgrowth of discussions within the
Professional Development Committee during 2000-2001, ELI was initiated in
2001-2002 as a way to support employee learning on many different levels.
The institute offers training opportunities through nine different modules: (1)
employee orientation, (2) learning organization, (3) learning-centered hiring
and selection process, (4) information technology, (5) governance, (6) employee
wellness, (7) strategic planning, (8) learning-centered employee evaluations,
and (9) employee awareness. Some of the training is required (e.g.,
sexual harassment, ethics), some is specific to Cascadia (e.g., learning organization,
governance, employee orientation), and some is related to job requirements
(e.g., information technology, hiring committee training).
- Teaching and Learning Academy (TLA) focuses on extending the scholarship,
research, and artistic creation of the faculty as well as every member of the
Cascadia community of learners. The TLA organizes a variety of development
opportunities such as forums, discussions, seminars, debates, and mentoring
in support of Cascadia's vision, mission, and values which emphasize a student
centered, innovative community for optimal teaching and learning.
Through the TLA, faculty receive support for all aspects of teaching and learning,
from preparation of course syllabi through assessment of effectiveness.
Continuous research into best practices in education plays a significant role in
the work of the TLA.
A Learning College
In a seminal article, "From Teaching to Learning-A New Paradigm for Undergraduate
Education" (1.22), Robert B. Barr and John Tagg describe what they perceive
as a sea change in higher education:
A paradigm shift is taking hold in American higher education. In its briefest
form, the paradigm that has governed our colleges is this: A college is an
institution that exists to provide instruction. Subtly but profoundly we are
shifting to a new paradigm: A college is an institution that exists to produce
learning. This shift changes everything. It is both needed and wanted.
In their article, the authors compare characteristics of the old (instructional) and
the new (learning) paradigms. Those comparisons are depicted in the following
table which is excerpted from the Environmental Forecast and College Profile 1999-
2000, prepared by Cascadia staff in spring-summer 1999 (1.25, p.64).
The concept of a learning college, as articulated by Barr and Tagg, as well as others
such as Boggs, 1993 (1.26) and O'Banion, 1997 (1.23), lies at the heart of
Cascadia's mission and values, and shapes many policies and practices at the new
college. Furthermore, while Barr and Tagg's model focuses exclusively on teaching
and learning between faculty and students, Cascadia's vision is to extend the principles
of the learning paradigm to employee learning as well. To some extent, this
extension leads the college into challenging and uncharted waters since it involves
trying to define "learning paradigm" (versus "teaching paradigm") roles and relationships
for all members of the community, not solely for faculty and students.
INSTRUCTIONAL PARADIGM
Mission and Purposes
- Provide/deliver instruction
- Transfer knowledge from faculty to students
- Offer courses and programs
- Improve the quality of instruction
- Achieve access for diverse students
Criteria for Success
- Inputs, resources
- Quality of entering students
- Curriculum development, expansion
- Quantity and quality of resources
- Enrollment, revenue growth
- Quality of faculty, instruction
Teaching/Learning Structures
- Atomistic; parts prior to whole
- Time held constant; learning varies
- 50-minute lecture, 3 unit course
- Classes start/end at same time
- One teacher, one classroom
- Independent disciplines, departments
- Covering material
- End-of-course assessment
- Grading within classes by instructors
- Private assessment
- Degree equals accumulated credit hours
Learning Theory
- Knowledge exists "out there"
- Knowledge comes in "chunks" and "bits" delivered by instructors
- Learning is cumulative and linear
- Fits the storehouse of knowledge metaphor
- "Live" teacher, "live" students required
- The classroom and learning are competitive and individualistic
Productivity/Funding
- Definition of productivity: cost per hour of instruction per student
- Funding for hours of instruction
Nature of Roles
- Faculty are primarily lecturers
- Faculty and students act independently and in isolation
- Teachers classify and sort students
- Staff serve/support faculty and the process of instruction
- Any expert can teach
- Line governance: independent actors
- All staff are educators who produce student learning and success
- Empowering learning is challenging and complex Shared governance; teamwork
|
|
LEARNING PARADIGM
Mission and Purposes
- Produce learning
- Elicit student discovery and construction of knowledge
- Elicit student discovery and construction of knowledge
- Elicit student discovery and construction of knowledge
- Improve the quality of learning
- Achieve success for diverse students
Criteria for Success
- Learning and student-success outcomes
- Quality of exiting students
- Learning technologies development, expansion
- Quantity and quality of outcomes
- Aggregate learning growth, efficiency
- Quality of students, learning
Teaching/Learning Structures
- Holistic, whole prior to parts
- Learning held constant, time varies
- Learning environments
- Environment ready when student is
- Whatever learning experience works
- Cross discipline/department collaboration
- Specified learning results
- Pre/during/post assessments
- External evaluations of learning
- Public assessment
- Degree equals demonstrated knowledge/skills
Learning Theory
- Talent and ability are rare
- Knowledge exists in each person's mind and is shaped by individual experience
- Knowledge is constructed, created
- Learning is a nesting and interacting of frameworks
- Fits "learning how to ride a bicycle" metaphor
- "Active" learner required, but not "live" teacher
- Learning environments and learning are cooperative, collaborative, and supportive
- Talent and ability are abundant
Productivity/Funding
- Definition of productivity: cost per unit of learning per student
- Funding for learning outcomes
Nature of Roles
- Faculty are primarily designers of learning methods and environments
- Faculty and students work in teams with each other and other staff
- Teachers develop every student's competencies and talents
|
The following examples illustrate the college's efforts to infuse the learning college
paradigm through everything the college does:
- Aspects of the learning paradigm are evident throughout Cascadia's core
values:
Community: The college is a community of learners...
Success: Cascadia values highly the academic and personal success of all
students. The Cascadia learning model approaches the learner holistically...
Student achievement is a hallmark of our mission...
Learning: All members of the community are learners... Learning is integrated
and interconnected; therefore, our programs are interdisciplinary...
Innovation: As a learning organization, Cascadia values creative pathways to
fulfill the college vision and mission, consistently encouraging collaborative
learning and growth...
- For students and staff alike, Cascadia focuses on learning and assessing four
College-wide Learning Outcomes: (1) think critically, creatively, and reflectively,
(2) learn actively, (3) communicate with clarity and originality, and (4)
interact in diverse and complex environments (1.5, p.8).
- Cascadia is developing an electronic portfolio (ePortfolio) to chronicle student
development, to showcase exemplary work, and to assess College-wide
Learning Outcomes. This is reflective of the learning paradigm's emphases,
assessment, and the development of learning technologies.
- Through its interdisciplinary Learning Communities, Cascadia breaks down
traditional discipline boundaries and challenges faculty and students alike to
synthesize knowledge across disciplines, to understand patterns, to make
connections among different schools of knowledge, and to integrate personal
experience and intellectual growth. Learning Communities embody many of
the characteristics of a learning college.
- Cascadia has been chosen as one of twelve community and technical colleges
to participate in the Vanguard Learning College Project sponsored by the
League for Innovation in the Community College. Colleges were selected for
this project because of their commitment to the learning paradigm, and
because they demonstrated the potential to infuse the learning paradigm
across instruction and support services within their institutions. The core
purpose of the project is "to foster the development of more learning-centered
community colleges by creating a network of 12 highly committed institutions
whose efforts can serve as models for other institutions moving into
learning-centered education" (1.27, p.1). The project focuses on five areas
within each institution: (1) organizational culture, (2) staff recruitment and
development, (3) information technology, (4) outcomes assessment, and (5)
underprepared learners. The Vanguard Learning College purpose and objectives
are completely consistent with Cascadia's vision, mission, and values and
are integrated into the college's annual planning cycle.
Educational Activities
All educational activities, from the overall programs offered at Cascadia, (e.g., its
degrees and certificates) through the learning outcomes defined for each course in
the Course Outcomes Guides (1.28), are a result of the college's planning based on
its vision and mission. Perhaps the earliest building blocks to be put in place were
the College-wide Learning Outcomes, developed during the 1999-2000 academic
year (before the opening of the college) by college staff and the Curriculum Learning
and Design Team (a group of four faculty members hired to design Cascadia's curriculum).
These four outcomes, based on the college's vision and mission, inform
not only all the curriculum development at the college but also all of its policies,
processes, and procedures. The College-wide Learning Outcomes are the learning
goals for all Cascadia students, faculty, administrators, and staff. The extent to
which they are infused into the curriculum is reflected in responses to the Cascadia
Student Survey (1.1) conducted in fall quarter 2001, in which 80% of respondents
reported that "faculty have successfully integrated the four learning outcomes into
the content of classes."
The development of the initial curriculum is described thoroughly in the Annual
Report 1999-2000 (1.12), including a graphic, which depicts the curriculum design
and development process at Cascadia. In addition to the College-wide Learning
Outcomes, the Intercollege Relations Commission (ICRC) guidelines for degrees
(2.5), and the Shoreline Community College curriculum guidelines were utilized in
developing appropriate degrees and certificates. Cascadia's vision as a community of learners is also reflected in its offering of a combination of stand alone courses, Learning Communities, linked courses and other unique activities to enhance the educational activities and fulfill the college's vision of "pioneering innovative pathways to successful learning." The organization of all college staff into four Learning Outcome Teams (LOTs), each of which includes a faculty component to oversee curriculum, also reflects the effort to include all staff in the community of learners. The LOTs are discussed in this Self Study in Standards 2, 4, and 6.
Admission Policies
Cascadia's admission policies are in compliance with Washington State law
regarding admission of students to a community college. Generally, students who
are 18 years of age or high school graduates are admitted on a first-come, first-served
basis in accordance with state law, (Revised Code of Washington 28B.50.090(3)b)
(1.29). Cascadia Community College maintains an open-door policy, and it is the
intent of the college that no student shall be denied admission because of her/his
educational background. Notwithstanding the foregoing, certain special procedures
(AP3: 4.10.01-05) are followed for special programs and populations of students.
These procedures are part of Cascadia's Policies and Procedures Manual (1.9) and also
listed in the Catalog (1.5) and quarterly Schedule of Classes (1.6).
Selection of Faculty
The faculty selection process was created to reflect both the college's institutional
values and its College-wide Learning Outcomes. The goal of the collaborative and
innovative process is to identify those instructors who can best contribute to building
upon the foundations of the college to help create a learner-centered, comprehensive,
culturally rich, and technologically advanced environment that will foster
educational excellence and the success of all college learners. The faculty selection
process includes several steps: (1) recruitment, (2) screening, (3) a fishbowl exercise
to help assess an individual's ability to work collaboratively in a team to problem solve,
communicate effectively, and think creatively and reflectively, (4) separate interviews with a team of faculty and with the Executive Team, (5) reference checking, and (6) decision to hire by the President. Throughout the process, candidates are asked questions and/or presented with situations to determine their understanding of and commitment to Cascadia's vision, mission, and core institutional values. A detailed explanation of these steps is published in the Annual Report 1999-2000 (1.12, pp. 38-39), and in the Policies and Procedures Manual (1.9), Administrative Procedure AP6: 3.31.03, and Standard 4 of this Self Study Report. Similar processes are used for the hiring of administrative and classified employees (administrative procedures AP6: 3.31.01 and AP6: 3.31.02) (1.9).
Planning and Allocation of Resources
Planning and the allocation of college resources is accomplished at Cascadia
through the continuing cycle of planning, budgeting, and assessment, which is
necessarily tied to the college's vision, mission, and core values pursuant to administrative procedure AP9: 5: 10.01 (1.9). General strategic directions are determined
through a collaborative process, and goals and specific strategies are developed to
take the college in those strategic directions. The Executive Team develops priorities,
and available funds are allocated against those priorities. In the 2001-2003 biennium,
for example, identified critical issues (of top priority for both funding and
effort) are accreditation, assessment, curriculum expansion, alternate scheduling,
and delivery. Refer to Strategic Plan 2001-2003, (1.11) for a detailed explanation of
the planning, budgeting, and assessment process.
Planning
Good work has begun, but much more lies ahead as Cascadia strives to embody
the ideals articulated in its vision, mission, and core values. The college will continue
to use its foundational documents, complemented and enhanced by research
on best practices, to provide direction to all of its activities. A high priority in the
near term is to develop and implement the comprehensive assessment practices and
create the culture of assessment that is fundamental to the college's vision, mission,
and values. Another focus will be to fully implement the Employee Learning Institute
and the Teaching and Learning Academy throughout the balance of 2001-2002
and through 2002-2003. As the college gains more experience and learns from it,
Cascadia also looks forward to sharing and learning with its fellow Vanguard Colleges.
View these and other exciting initiatives by clicking on the options to the left.
|
 |
|